494
D vs. Illinois 708; -8, -9
P vs. ISU 981; +14, +23
D vs. Chicago 697; -10, +4
P vs. Bradley 776; +3, -1
4-4, CS: 19, PD: +6
495
P vs. Chicago 698; +4, +2
P vs. Lewis 888; -11, -2
D vs. Chicago 696; -5, Tie
D vs. Illinois 709; -3, -2
2-5-1, CS: 23, -17
Individual Awards:
Natalie Koljanski, 18 Rank P Witness
496
P vs. Chicago 696; -11, -23
P vs. DePaul 464; Tie, -7
D vs. Bradley 777; -5, +2
D vs. DePaul 465, +11, -1
2-5-1, CS: 16.5, -34
Individual Awards:
Martin Mackowsky, 17 Rank P Attorney
Tab Summary: http://web.archive.org/web/20060226064925/www.collegemocktrial.org/regionalresults/2005/2005JolietTabSummary.doc
D vs. Illinois 708; -8, -9
P vs. ISU 981; +14, +23
D vs. Chicago 697; -10, +4
P vs. Bradley 776; +3, -1
4-4, CS: 19, PD: +6
495
P vs. Chicago 698; +4, +2
P vs. Lewis 888; -11, -2
D vs. Chicago 696; -5, Tie
D vs. Illinois 709; -3, -2
2-5-1, CS: 23, -17
Individual Awards:
Natalie Koljanski, 18 Rank P Witness
496
P vs. Chicago 696; -11, -23
P vs. DePaul 464; Tie, -7
D vs. Bradley 777; -5, +2
D vs. DePaul 465, +11, -1
2-5-1, CS: 16.5, -34
Individual Awards:
Martin Mackowsky, 17 Rank P Attorney
Tab Summary: http://web.archive.org/web/20060226064925/www.collegemocktrial.org/regionalresults/2005/2005JolietTabSummary.doc